I will explain here the solutions and its principle for avoiding production losses when photovoltaic systems are located in cases where there is shadow of trees, dust, chimneys, antenna, other buildings or specific relief. The idea is to install one micro inverter per Photovoltaic module to track individual Maximum Power Point. I will detail 2 design approaches with their benfits & drawbacks.
Principle: Today Photovoltaic systems are made with serial PV (PhotoVoltaic) modules to obtain a voltage in accordance with inverter input voltage. This inverter manages a global MPPT (Maximum Power Point Tracking).
This principle is well when Photovoltaic modules are very similar and when sunlight is homogeneous on the entire Photovoltaic array.
Unfortunately there are a lot of cases where a shadowing can impact a part of Photovoltaic array (tree, dust, chimneys, antenna, other buildings or specific relief).
In this case, the shadowed module curve ( I-current versus V-voltage) moves as described in the following diagram. The current decreases a lot but not the voltage.
Shadowed module has low current. To avoid impacting all the string, modules manufacturer adds bypass diodes inside the junction box and then shadowed module is bypassed.
When module is partially shaded, the current don’t switch to the diode and energy yield can be impacted with production losses up to 30% under 10% Photovoltaic shading.
See excellent article : Effects of shadow on grid connected Photovoltaic systems, N. Chantreuil, F. Barruel, X. Lepivert, H. Buttin, J. Merten, INES R.D.I., laboratory for solar Systems (L2S)
The best solution to avoid these production losses is to have distributed MPP Tracking. That means one micro inverter per Photovoltaic module to track individual Maximum Power Point. Then micro inverter s can take the maximum power of each individual module without impacting the other module and the production is fully optimized always.
There are few actors with two approaches of distributed micro inverter s.
Distributed micro inverter s actors:
- Enphase Energy technology is based on a DC/AC micro converter and each converter is connected in parallel on a common AC bus.
- GreenRay solar.
- Petra Solar with SunWave AC Module.
- Solar Bridge Technologies.
Distributed DC/DC converters with centralized inverter actors:
- eIQ energy : bases on DC/DC micro converter with a independent voltage output and can be used with standard inveter.
- SolarEdge : based on DC/DC micro converter with a dedicated central inverter without the entry stage ( boost and mppt)
And new actors arrive on this market but the products aren’t still ready and the website:
At least, research departments are looking on this technology:
- Solution Photovoltaic : a consortium of 8 research centres, universities and industrials with French government funds is working on it too.
Both approaches fix the partial Photovoltaic shading issue.
My preference is for distributed DC/DC converter associated to a centralized inverter because :
- it’s easier and more safety to manage one grid connection point. All specific requirements for grid connection are very strong (VDE 126-1-1, RD1663, DK5940) and the multiplication of the deconnection devices increase the failure rate.
- there devices are subject to extreme temperature because of roof installation and this approach is minimizing the electronic parts and allow to increase the failure rate .
Pro’s & Con’s
Benefits of these distributed micro inverter architecture are:
- Improve energy harvest in case of partial Photovoltaic shading
- Cancel module mismatch impact: Each module is independent and module ranking isn’t necessary.
- Improve the safety: the DC voltage may be switch off at the module level versus a string where dangerous high DC voltage is done during all the day. (Arc detection is sometime promoted by manufacturer too)
- Allow supervision up to the module: if micro-converters have communication board embedded, it’s easy to have high level of supervision
- Higher price per Watt than a centralized converter. This solution costs 5% more than a centralized inverter (and conversion share is twice).
- Lower efficiency than a centralized inverter. We consider efficiency around 95 – 96 % for global converter versus 97 – 98 % with a centralized inverter.
Also why using distributed solution? Higher price (+5%) and lower efficiency (-3%) are the opposite than the customer want: have the smallest ROI!
But when Photovoltaic array is not installed in optimum situation as shadow not removable (chimney, lift machinery, air cooling systems …) the micro inverter technology balance higher price and lower efficiency regards improve energy harvest.
This technology is very interesting when Photovoltaic systems are installed on urban roof where Photovoltaic shading constraints are not removable or where multi orientations are required by building architecture. It isn’t required for solar farm where Photovoltaic shading can be cancelled and modules orientation is optimized.
Different market surveys consider than this disruptive solution will take between 2% to 10% of the solar market in the next 3 years. It will be a success story for disruptive innovation!